It's hot...much warmer than it should be in early May. The classical music playing behind me is being mixed with the sound of the fan that is trying to move the warm air around the small apt. The room is filled with late afternoon light, gradually becoming dimmer as the sun sets below the rooftops of the nearby buildings. I'm typing on a stolen computer and trying to argue the humor of Flannery O'Connor. This is proving rather more difficult than I would like - perhaps if I finish my glass of wine it will come more easily...
"I'll fight you on whether those stories are actually funny."
"They are actually funny."
"Are they actually funny or is it just the way you look at them?"
I was trying to say that she portrays the human condition - the humor of it along with its tragedy, patheticness, and pathos. I want to argue that she seems to say that humor is essentially part of life, whereas my friend says that the human condition has nothing funny about it, but the humor comes from the way you look at it.
Now granted there are somethings that are just not funny any way you look at them... but this is something different. I just can't quite put my finger on how...
08 May 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Where does one define the border of humor? Is it a subjective border of fluctuation that bends with familiarity, affection, and fondness, but also with jealousy, misgivings, and spite? But do any of these matter with the objectivity and realism that O'Connor writes with? Her insight into the fickle mind of a human is both comical and frightening in the sense that she reveals how pathetic and maleable we really are...
Fortunately, we have God to compromise for our weaknesses so we can laugh...or am I being sarcastic?
Either way, her stories are humorous, albeit a dark humor.
Post a Comment